## Make.com vs n8n: A Realistic Comparison for 2025
Automation platforms are the backbone of modern productivity, and in 2025, **Make.com** and **n8n** are the two most talked-about solutions for connecting business software and automating workflows. But what are the hard facts, and which tool best fits real-world needs? Here’s an honest side-by-side breakdown.
### Approach and Use Cases
**Make.com** is the mass-market, no-code automation platform. Its visual drag-and-drop interface and vast template catalog make it accessible for individuals, SMBs, and even large enterprises needing quick, code-free solutions. It’s ideal for marketers, operations teams, and anyone automating SaaS tools without developer support.[2][3][5]
**n8n**, on the other hand, lives in the developer and technically ambitious world. Open-source, flexible, and highly customizable, it gives users control over hosting, logic, and integrations, making it suited for organizations with technical resources, niche APIs, and security needs.[3][11][2]
***
### Templates & Integrations: The Numbers
The template ecosystem is a telling indicator of a platform’s focus.
- **Make.com** boasts **7,000+ business-ready templates** and automations for popular SaaS platforms, making it the clear leader for onboarding speed and plug-and-play value.[10][12]
- **n8n** offers about **800–1,700 workflow templates**, contributed mainly by its community. Templates are less visual, more code-oriented, and favored by users starting their automations with examples they can adapt.[11]
- In terms of integrations, Make.com covers over **2,100 apps** while n8n supports **400–1,000+ connections**, with the ability for users to create their own custom nodes.[12][11]
***
### User Base and Organizations
User adoption tells its own story.
- **Make.com** powers automation for **3.1 million active users** as of late 2024–2025, spanning **350,000+ enterprise organizations**. Its low entry barrier and marketing focus broaden the appeal.[14][12]
- **n8n** is quickly growing with **200,000–230,000 users** and over **3,000 enterprise customers** worldwide. Governments, tech teams, and privacy-focused organizations anchor the active community.[13][15]
***
### Core Strengths and Weaknesses
**Make.com:**
- **Strengths:** Massive template library, smooth onboarding, excellent documentation, beginner-friendly, instant integrations, business-ready features.[10][12]
- **Limitations:** No self-hosting, less backend flexibility or custom logic, can get expensive for high-volume users, limited in advanced AI and scripting.[2][3]
**n8n:**
- **Strengths:** Self-hosting, open-source control, deep customization, support for advanced triggers and error handling, developer-friendly, excellent for complex scenarios.[11]
- **Limitations:** Fewer templates and plug-and-play integrations, steeper learning curve, relies on community support, more technical setup.[3][11]
***
### Pricing Models
- **Make.com** uses operation-based tiered pricing, starting with a free plan for 1,000 operations/month, but costs can escalate with scale.[12]
- **n8n** offers a free, unlimited self-hosted edition and workflow/execution-based cloud tiers, which is cost-effective for developers but can require technical resources.[11]
***
### Detailed Comparison Table (2025)
| Feature/Aspect | Make.com | n8n |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Core Focus | No-code, visual, rapid business automation | Low-code, technical, developer-centric |
| Number of Templates | 7,000+ [10] | 800–1,700 (community-driven) [11] |
| Number of Integrations | 2,100+ [12] | 400–1,000+ (custom possible) [11] |
| Active User Base | 3.1 million [12][14] | 200,000–230,000 [13][15] |
| Enterprise Customers | 350,000+ [14] | 3,000+ [15] |
| Hosting Type | Cloud only [14] | Self-hosted or cloud [11] |
| Pricing | Usage-tiered, operation-based [12] | Free self-hosted; cloud workflow-based [11] |
| Template Style | Structured, drag-and-drop [10] | Sample, code-oriented [11] |
| Typical User | Non-technical teams, SMBs, enterprise ops | Developers, technical teams, governments |
| Learning Curve | Beginner-friendly | Steep until familiar |
***
### The Hard Truth
**Make.com** is unbeatable for businesses that want to automate fast, use templates, and avoid technical hurdles. Its massive template library and user base are unmatched for rapid, reliable automation. However, its lack of self-hosting, backend control, and customization potentially limits power users and those with strict security or integration needs.
**n8n** is the platform of choice for those willing to invest time and technical effort for ultimate flexibility, privacy, and customization. Its template ecosystem is smaller, but its developer and open-source focus pays off for teams seeking advanced scenarios or control over infrastructure.
Selecting between the two depends on the user’s technical skill, scale, and business automation needs. Both are industry leaders—but each solves a distinct set of problems for a distinct subset of users in 2025.[5][15][1][13][14][2][3][10][12][11]
[1](https://softailed.com/blog/n8n-vs-make)
[2](https://brainstreamtechnolabs.com/n8n-vs-make-com/)
[3](https://www.knack.com/blog/n8n-vs-make/)
[4](https://www.make.com/en/blog/make-vs-n8n)
[5](https://www.soraia.io/blog/n8n-vs-make-which-workflow-automation-tool-wins-2025)
[6](https://nicksaraev.com/n8n-vs-make-2025/)
[7](https://www.reddit.com/r/n8n/comments/1hpxg9i/n8n_vs_makecom_community_updates/)
[8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNI1kdkxaLo)
[9](https://www.digidop.com/blog/n8n-vs-make-vs-zapier)
[10](https://www.make.com/en/templates)
[11](https://www.baytechconsulting.com/blog/n8n-overview-2025)
[12](https://www.make.com/en/blog/2024-automation-wrap-up)
[13](https://www.highlandeurope.com/n8n-raises-e55-million-from-highland-europe-to-transform-workflow-automation-for-technical-teams-by-unifying-ai-code-and-human-building-blocks/)
[14](https://www.make.com/en/about)
[15](https://techcrunch.com/2025/03/24/fair-code-pioneer-n8n-raises-60m-for-ai-powered-workflow-automation/)
Comments
Post a Comment